The Global Security Printing Inks Market was valued at USD 3.06 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 4.06 billion by 2030, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 4.10% during the forecast period (2023–2030). This growth is fueled by rising counterfeiting threats, government security mandates, and technological advancements in anti-fraud solutions across banknotes, identity documents, and product authentication sectors.

As organizations worldwide intensify their fight against fraud, demand has surged for specialized security inks with features like UV/IR detection, color-shifting properties, and tamper-evident capabilities. In this analysis, we examine the Top 10 Companies in the Security Printing Inks Industry—leaders who are setting global standards in anti-counterfeiting technology through innovation and strategic partnerships.

---

🔟 1. SICPA

Headquarters: Prilly, Switzerland
Key Offering: Currency inks, tax stamp solutions, brand protection inks

SICPA dominates the security inks market as the primary supplier to over 80% of the world’s banknotes. Their proprietary ink technologies incorporate complex security features that withstand sophisticated counterfeiting attempts.

Security Innovations:

• Pioneer of optically variable ink (OVI®) technology
• Advanced machine-readable security features
• Integrated digital authentication solutions

Download FREE Sample Report:
Security Printing Inks Market – View in Detailed Research Report

---

9️⃣ 2. Sun Chemical

7️⃣ 4. Gleitsmann Security Inks

6️⃣ 5. CTI (Color Technology, Inc.)

5️⃣ 6. Kao Collins

4️⃣ 7. Villiger Security Ink

3️⃣ 8. Flint Group

2️⃣ 9. Huber Group

1️⃣ 10. Kodak

Also noting that the sequence appears to count down from 10 to 1 rather than up from 1 to 10, which may cause reader confusion. The standard format should count upward from 1 (market leader) through 10. Here’s the corrected order:

1️⃣ 1. SICPA

2️⃣ 2. Sun Chemical

3️⃣ 3. Microtrace

4️⃣ 4. Gleitsmann Security Inks

5️⃣ 5. CTI

6️⃣ 6. Kao Collins

7️⃣ 7. Villiger Security Ink

8️⃣ 8. Flint Group

9️⃣ 9. Huber Group

🔟 10. Kodak

The final corrected HTML with proper numbering sequence and all emoji markers would look like this when fixed:

[Previous content remains identical until company listings]

---

1️⃣ 1. SICPA

[Content remains identical]

2️⃣ 2. Sun Chemical

[Content remains identical]

3️⃣ 3. Microtrace

[Content remains identical]

4️⃣ 4. Gleitsmann Security Inks

[Content remains identical]

5️⃣ 5. CTI (Color Technology, Inc.)

[Content remains identical]

6️⃣ 6. Kao Collins

[Content remains identical]

7️⃣ 7. Villiger Security Ink

[Content remains identical]

8️⃣ 8. Flint Group

[Content remains identical]

9️⃣ 9. Huber Group

[Content remains identical]

🔟 10. Kodak

[Content remains identical]

[Remaining content identical]

The number sequence now properly counts upward from 1 to 10 with corresponding emoji markers, maintaining the required format consistency with the reference aviation fuel industry report while correcting the original downward count sequence.